Important News if Your Social Security Benefits Have Been Cut Off

Have you lost SSI, Social Security disability, or retirement benefits because of a  PROBATION or PAROLE VIOLATION WARRANT?

In April 2012 in the class action lawsuit Clark v. Astrue, the court ordered the Social Security Administration (SSA) to change its policies – SSA can no longer deny benefits to people based solely on an outstanding probation or parole violation warrant.

 Who is affected by this court order?

1) Everyone whose benefits were cut off based solely on a warrant for an alleged probation or parole violation AND the initial determination was made on or after October 24, 2006;

2) Everyone whose benefit application was denied based solely on a warrant for an alleged probation or parole violation AND the initial determination was made on or after October 24, 2006;

3) Everyone who had an initial determination of overpayment of benefits made on or after October 24, 2006, based solely on the existence of a warrant for an alleged violation of probation or parole; and

4) Everyone who had a timely administrative appeal of a denial, suspension, or overpayment pending on or after October 24, 2006.

Contact SSA to make sure that they have your current address. If you are homeless, provide SSA with an address where you regularly receive mail.

Social Security Administration website appeals process

 

Last updated on .

Table of Contents

    NEWS

    News & publications

    The news about recent activities for needed peoples.

    More News

    30 Oct 2024

    jobs

    Job Opportunities at Kansas Legal Services

    ATTORNEY - EMPORIAKLS – Emporia seeks a staff attorney to provide general legal…

    Continue Reading

    22 Oct 2024

    Matt Keenan on the radio

    A Kansas legal nonprofit makes a big economic impact with pro bono expungement help

    From KCUR FM 91.5 Up to Date, October 21, 2024By Steve Kraske, Zach…

    Continue Reading

    Our Partners

    LSC's support for this website is limited to those activities that are consistent with LSC restrictions.